igforum.bio / could-we-lose-the-right-to-repair-our-cars-repair-roundup-week-of-may-9-ifixit-news - 144467
A
%Begin Could We Lose The Right to Repair Our Cars  Repair Roundup  Week of May 9  iFixit News Ana içeriğe geç Eşyalarını Tamir Et Topluluk Mağaza Roundups 
 <h1>Could We Lose The Right to Repair Our Cars  Repair Roundup  Week of May 9</h1> Article by: Paul Roberts &#64;repairnews May 14, 2022 Filed under: Consumer Rights, Legislation, Right to Repair, Roundups, Tech News, Product Design Yorum Ekle Facebook Twitter Reddit Linkedin Email Copy Link Share Each week, we will bring you the top repair news from around the world, curated for iFixit by the folks over at the&nbsp;Fight to Repair blog. Sign up here.
%Begin Could We Lose The Right to Repair Our Cars Repair Roundup Week of May 9 iFixit News Ana içeriğe geç Eşyalarını Tamir Et Topluluk Mağaza Roundups

Could We Lose The Right to Repair Our Cars Repair Roundup Week of May 9

Article by: Paul Roberts @repairnews May 14, 2022 Filed under: Consumer Rights, Legislation, Right to Repair, Roundups, Tech News, Product Design Yorum Ekle Facebook Twitter Reddit Linkedin Email Copy Link Share Each week, we will bring you the top repair news from around the world, curated for iFixit by the folks over at the Fight to Repair blog. Sign up here.
thumb_up Like (7)
comment Reply (2)
share Share
visibility 674 views
thumb_up 7 likes
comment 2 replies
J
James Smith 5 minutes ago

The Big News

We may be losing the right to repair our cars Here s how

One b...
J
Joseph Kim 2 minutes ago
That one state law turned into a de-facto national law, after major automakers, in 2014, signed a me...
C
<h2>The Big News  </h2> 
 <h3>We may be losing the right to repair our cars  Here s how  </h3> One bright spot in the years-long struggle to win a right to repair in the U.S. has been automobile repair. That’s because voters in Massachusetts, in 2012, became the first in the United States to create a legal right to repair of any kind: passing a ballot measure that required automakers with dealerships in the Bay State to supply owners and independent mechanics with access to the same software and diagnostic information that they provided to their dealerships and authorized repair shops.

The Big News

We may be losing the right to repair our cars Here s how

One bright spot in the years-long struggle to win a right to repair in the U.S. has been automobile repair. That’s because voters in Massachusetts, in 2012, became the first in the United States to create a legal right to repair of any kind: passing a ballot measure that required automakers with dealerships in the Bay State to supply owners and independent mechanics with access to the same software and diagnostic information that they provided to their dealerships and authorized repair shops.
thumb_up Like (2)
comment Reply (1)
thumb_up 2 likes
comment 1 replies
E
Ella Rodriguez 2 minutes ago
That one state law turned into a de-facto national law, after major automakers, in 2014, signed a me...
J
That one state law turned into a de-facto national law, after major automakers, in 2014, signed a memorandum of understanding (PDF) recognizing Massachusetts’ law nationally. Since then, hundreds of millions of car owners in the U.S. have enjoyed the fruits of a robust and diversified market for auto repairs: affordable prices and lots of choices including dealerships, authorized repair providers, independent garages, and retail parts suppliers that enable owner repair of their vehicles.&nbsp;Far from lamenting their decision in 2012, Massachusetts voters doubled down on it: passing an expansion of that law giving owners access to wireless telematics data in November 2020 by a 3:1 margin.
That one state law turned into a de-facto national law, after major automakers, in 2014, signed a memorandum of understanding (PDF) recognizing Massachusetts’ law nationally. Since then, hundreds of millions of car owners in the U.S. have enjoyed the fruits of a robust and diversified market for auto repairs: affordable prices and lots of choices including dealerships, authorized repair providers, independent garages, and retail parts suppliers that enable owner repair of their vehicles. Far from lamenting their decision in 2012, Massachusetts voters doubled down on it: passing an expansion of that law giving owners access to wireless telematics data in November 2020 by a 3:1 margin.
thumb_up Like (16)
comment Reply (0)
thumb_up 16 likes
L
In the decade since that law passed, Massachusetts’ automobile right to repair law has served as a gentle reminder to legislators and consumers alike that they already benefit from a right to repair law. It has also been proof that manufacturers’ and industry lobbyists’ dire warnings about the dire consequences of a legal right to repair are so much hot air.&nbsp; But as Colorado’s governor prepares to sign the first, new right to repair bill of any kind into law since that landmark 2012 Massachusetts ballot measure, the right to repair automobiles itself is suddenly at risk: imperiled by changing technology, lawsuits, and a fast-shifting legal terrain.&nbsp;Here are three developments that, taken together, could spell an end to the U.S.’s decade-long experiment with automobile right to repair: 
 <h4>Legal Threats to Massachusetts Law</h4> First, Massachusetts voters&#8217; 2020 decision to expand their state’s right to repair law is being challenged in Federal court by automakers, who charge that it usurps federal authority and safety standards.
In the decade since that law passed, Massachusetts’ automobile right to repair law has served as a gentle reminder to legislators and consumers alike that they already benefit from a right to repair law. It has also been proof that manufacturers’ and industry lobbyists’ dire warnings about the dire consequences of a legal right to repair are so much hot air.  But as Colorado’s governor prepares to sign the first, new right to repair bill of any kind into law since that landmark 2012 Massachusetts ballot measure, the right to repair automobiles itself is suddenly at risk: imperiled by changing technology, lawsuits, and a fast-shifting legal terrain. Here are three developments that, taken together, could spell an end to the U.S.’s decade-long experiment with automobile right to repair:

Legal Threats to Massachusetts Law

First, Massachusetts voters’ 2020 decision to expand their state’s right to repair law is being challenged in Federal court by automakers, who charge that it usurps federal authority and safety standards.
thumb_up Like (42)
comment Reply (3)
thumb_up 42 likes
comment 3 replies
H
Harper Kim 4 minutes ago
Testimony in that case wrapped up in early 2022, with a decision first expected in March, then postp...
L
Luna Park 1 minutes ago
Even if the ballot initiative prevails there, other carmakers may simply follow the example of Subar...
D
Testimony in that case wrapped up in early 2022, with a decision first expected in March, then postponed to April, and then again to July. But some automakers (notably: Subaru and Kia) have already started disabling telematics enabled features in their vehicles rather than complying with the expanded right to repair law. Regardless of the decision, appeals are likely and the ultimate fate of the law may rest in the hands of a conservative Supreme Court with a negligible history of defending the rights of consumers against powerful corporate interests.
Testimony in that case wrapped up in early 2022, with a decision first expected in March, then postponed to April, and then again to July. But some automakers (notably: Subaru and Kia) have already started disabling telematics enabled features in their vehicles rather than complying with the expanded right to repair law. Regardless of the decision, appeals are likely and the ultimate fate of the law may rest in the hands of a conservative Supreme Court with a negligible history of defending the rights of consumers against powerful corporate interests.
thumb_up Like (26)
comment Reply (1)
thumb_up 26 likes
comment 1 replies
S
Sophia Chen 2 minutes ago
Even if the ballot initiative prevails there, other carmakers may simply follow the example of Subar...
E
Even if the ballot initiative prevails there, other carmakers may simply follow the example of Subaru and Kia, dispensing with the memorandum of understanding and cutting off access to data and features for Massachusetts car owners rather than opening wireless telematics systems to third parties (and competition). <h4>Advanced Driver Assistance Overreach</h4> Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) are saving lives with features like auto-braking and lane monitoring.
Even if the ballot initiative prevails there, other carmakers may simply follow the example of Subaru and Kia, dispensing with the memorandum of understanding and cutting off access to data and features for Massachusetts car owners rather than opening wireless telematics systems to third parties (and competition).

Advanced Driver Assistance Overreach

Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) are saving lives with features like auto-braking and lane monitoring.
thumb_up Like (38)
comment Reply (3)
thumb_up 38 likes
comment 3 replies
A
Alexander Wang 18 minutes ago
They are also threatening to upend the aftermarket parts and service business. As we noted in this b...
T
Thomas Anderson 1 minutes ago
Safety concerns over the impact of repairs on the functioning of the ADAS system are being used as a...
W
They are also threatening to upend the aftermarket parts and service business. As we noted in this blog post, Ford Motor Co.’s newly launched Ford Certified Glass Network (FCGN) is one example of what may be coming. The program is part of a larger effort, which also includes vehicle makers like Volvo, to cite ADAS reliance on cameras and sensors mounted on vehicles to try to limit who can conduct repairs like windshield and bumper replacement, what parts and tools they can use, and so on.
They are also threatening to upend the aftermarket parts and service business. As we noted in this blog post, Ford Motor Co.’s newly launched Ford Certified Glass Network (FCGN) is one example of what may be coming. The program is part of a larger effort, which also includes vehicle makers like Volvo, to cite ADAS reliance on cameras and sensors mounted on vehicles to try to limit who can conduct repairs like windshield and bumper replacement, what parts and tools they can use, and so on.
thumb_up Like (25)
comment Reply (1)
thumb_up 25 likes
comment 1 replies
M
Mason Rodriguez 1 minutes ago
Safety concerns over the impact of repairs on the functioning of the ADAS system are being used as a...
A
Safety concerns over the impact of repairs on the functioning of the ADAS system are being used as a justification for what amount to anti-competitive restrictions. <h4>Design Patents</h4> Another threat to the right to repair automobiles comes in the form of “design patents” on common replacement parts like side-view mirrors and bumpers.
Safety concerns over the impact of repairs on the functioning of the ADAS system are being used as a justification for what amount to anti-competitive restrictions.

Design Patents

Another threat to the right to repair automobiles comes in the form of “design patents” on common replacement parts like side-view mirrors and bumpers.
thumb_up Like (49)
comment Reply (1)
thumb_up 49 likes
comment 1 replies
R
Ryan Garcia 1 minutes ago
These patents are increasingly being used by automakers to prevent lookalike aftermarket alternative...
G
These patents are increasingly being used by automakers to prevent lookalike aftermarket alternatives. As this article points out, court rulings as recently as 2019 and stretching as far back as 1980 have gradually strengthened the hands of OEMs to apply such patents to discrete parts and to use them to thwart competition.&nbsp;While the Federal Trade Commission would appear to be empowered to stop this anti-competitive behavior, an activist Supreme Court dominated by conservatives hostile to “the administrative state” is anxious to rein in the federal government’s “administrative regulatory apparatus.” Were the FTC to move to block the use of such design patents to frustrate the aftermarket parts industry, as it appears to be empowered to do, SCOTUS might respond with a ruling that eviscerates much of the FTC’s long-recognized authority to declare given practices “unfair,” with a tendentious reading of the half-century-old legislation creating and empowering the agency.
These patents are increasingly being used by automakers to prevent lookalike aftermarket alternatives. As this article points out, court rulings as recently as 2019 and stretching as far back as 1980 have gradually strengthened the hands of OEMs to apply such patents to discrete parts and to use them to thwart competition. While the Federal Trade Commission would appear to be empowered to stop this anti-competitive behavior, an activist Supreme Court dominated by conservatives hostile to “the administrative state” is anxious to rein in the federal government’s “administrative regulatory apparatus.” Were the FTC to move to block the use of such design patents to frustrate the aftermarket parts industry, as it appears to be empowered to do, SCOTUS might respond with a ruling that eviscerates much of the FTC’s long-recognized authority to declare given practices “unfair,” with a tendentious reading of the half-century-old legislation creating and empowering the agency.
thumb_up Like (24)
comment Reply (3)
thumb_up 24 likes
comment 3 replies
S
Sophia Chen 8 minutes ago
The solution to all of these issues? Pass new laws that make a right to repair explicit. That would ...
K
Kevin Wang 3 minutes ago
In the case of automobiles, there are two, separate federal right to repair laws proposed: the SMART...
O
The solution to all of these issues? Pass new laws that make a right to repair explicit. That would include the proposed Fair Repair Act, a federal version of right to repair laws that have been proposed in almost every state.
The solution to all of these issues? Pass new laws that make a right to repair explicit. That would include the proposed Fair Repair Act, a federal version of right to repair laws that have been proposed in almost every state.
thumb_up Like (39)
comment Reply (2)
thumb_up 39 likes
comment 2 replies
K
Kevin Wang 18 minutes ago
In the case of automobiles, there are two, separate federal right to repair laws proposed: the SMART...
J
Joseph Kim 12 minutes ago
But it’s easy to “study” an issue, harder to solve it. Unfortunately, Microsoft killed its bes...
N
In the case of automobiles, there are two, separate federal right to repair laws proposed: the SMART Act (*), which amends existing design patent law to shrink automakers’ enforcement window from 15 years down to 2.5 years and the Right to Equitable and Professional Auto Industry Repair (REPAIR) Act, which federalizes many of the protections in the Massachusetts law. Device Page 
 <h3>Car and Truck</h3> Repair manuals and support for 4-wheeled passenger and cargo vehicles. View Device 
 <h2>Other News </h2> 
 <h3>Microsoft Killed Its Best Tool for Right to Repair  Physical Stores  reviewgeek com </h3> An&nbsp;independent study&nbsp;Microsoft funded recently showed that improving repair processes could prevent greenhouse gases and avoid e-waste.
In the case of automobiles, there are two, separate federal right to repair laws proposed: the SMART Act (*), which amends existing design patent law to shrink automakers’ enforcement window from 15 years down to 2.5 years and the Right to Equitable and Professional Auto Industry Repair (REPAIR) Act, which federalizes many of the protections in the Massachusetts law. Device Page

Car and Truck

Repair manuals and support for 4-wheeled passenger and cargo vehicles. View Device

Other News

Microsoft Killed Its Best Tool for Right to Repair Physical Stores reviewgeek com

An independent study Microsoft funded recently showed that improving repair processes could prevent greenhouse gases and avoid e-waste.
thumb_up Like (43)
comment Reply (0)
thumb_up 43 likes
D
But it’s easy to “study” an issue, harder to solve it. Unfortunately, Microsoft killed its best tool to tackle repairability—brick and mortar Microsoft Stores.<br><br>Microsoft should open stores in accessible locations with a focus on repair, teaching, and help. Selling Surface tablets and laptops could continue, but as a side business and not the goal for profitability.
But it’s easy to “study” an issue, harder to solve it. Unfortunately, Microsoft killed its best tool to tackle repairability—brick and mortar Microsoft Stores.

Microsoft should open stores in accessible locations with a focus on repair, teaching, and help. Selling Surface tablets and laptops could continue, but as a side business and not the goal for profitability.
thumb_up Like (34)
comment Reply (0)
thumb_up 34 likes
A
Imagine if the Microsoft Store was a place you could go to learn how to use your new laptop, no matter who made it. You could go to the Microsoft Store for help when you run into an issue.
Imagine if the Microsoft Store was a place you could go to learn how to use your new laptop, no matter who made it. You could go to the Microsoft Store for help when you run into an issue.
thumb_up Like (38)
comment Reply (0)
thumb_up 38 likes
E
And when you drop your laptop or tablet, the Microsoft Store could be there to fix it. <h3>Colorado Set to Become First State with Right-to-Repair Wheelchair Law   Colorado Sun </h3> A bill on its way to Gov.
And when you drop your laptop or tablet, the Microsoft Store could be there to fix it.

Colorado Set to Become First State with Right-to-Repair Wheelchair Law Colorado Sun

A bill on its way to Gov.
thumb_up Like (22)
comment Reply (2)
thumb_up 22 likes
comment 2 replies
J
Joseph Kim 12 minutes ago
Jared Polis could make it a lot easier for Jennings and other powered-wheelchair users to repair the...
A
Alexander Wang 3 minutes ago

Two Behemoths Dominate the Motorized Wheelchair Industry Customers Pay the Price Mother Jones...

D
Jared Polis could make it a lot easier for Jennings and other powered-wheelchair users to repair their equipment.&nbsp;House Bill 1031&nbsp;would require manufacturers to make parts, tools, repair manuals, and digital access available to powered wheelchair owners and independent repairers at reasonable prices.<br><br>The bill would require powered wheelchair manufacturers to make parts, software, firmware, tools, and documentation accessible to owners and independent repairers. Failure to comply with the regulations would be considered a deceptive trade practice and subject to a fine of up to $20,000 for each violation.
Jared Polis could make it a lot easier for Jennings and other powered-wheelchair users to repair their equipment. House Bill 1031 would require manufacturers to make parts, tools, repair manuals, and digital access available to powered wheelchair owners and independent repairers at reasonable prices.

The bill would require powered wheelchair manufacturers to make parts, software, firmware, tools, and documentation accessible to owners and independent repairers. Failure to comply with the regulations would be considered a deceptive trade practice and subject to a fine of up to $20,000 for each violation.
thumb_up Like (14)
comment Reply (0)
thumb_up 14 likes
C
<h3>Two Behemoths Dominate the Motorized Wheelchair Industry  Customers Pay the Price   Mother Jones </h3> A sudden loss of mobility can affect everything from wheelchair users’ nutrition to their finances. Pressure sores from long stays in bed can lead to infections, hospitalization, even death. But Howey is one of thousands of disabled Americans increasingly experiencing long waits in a fast-consolidating market dominated by a handful of large national suppliers backed by private equity firms.

Two Behemoths Dominate the Motorized Wheelchair Industry Customers Pay the Price Mother Jones

A sudden loss of mobility can affect everything from wheelchair users’ nutrition to their finances. Pressure sores from long stays in bed can lead to infections, hospitalization, even death. But Howey is one of thousands of disabled Americans increasingly experiencing long waits in a fast-consolidating market dominated by a handful of large national suppliers backed by private equity firms.
thumb_up Like (14)
comment Reply (0)
thumb_up 14 likes
J
Device Page 
 <h3>iPhone 12</h3> Apple&#039;s mainstream 2020 iPhone was released October 23rd and comes with a 6.1&quot; OLED display, a dual 12 MP camera system, and in five available colors. Successor to the iPhone 11. View Device 
 <h3>Apple&#8217 s Self Repair Program Was Never Going to be What Repair Advocates Wanted   Apple Insider </h3> Apple&#8217;s Self Service Repair program isn&#8217;t a perfect solution that addresses all of the concerns from the Right to Repair movement.
Device Page

iPhone 12

Apple's mainstream 2020 iPhone was released October 23rd and comes with a 6.1" OLED display, a dual 12 MP camera system, and in five available colors. Successor to the iPhone 11. View Device

Apple’ s Self Repair Program Was Never Going to be What Repair Advocates Wanted Apple Insider

Apple’s Self Service Repair program isn’t a perfect solution that addresses all of the concerns from the Right to Repair movement.
thumb_up Like (36)
comment Reply (0)
thumb_up 36 likes
W
It was never meant to be. The&nbsp;iPhone&nbsp;maker launched the Self Service Repair portal in April, allowing customers to order parts, tools, and other resources to repair their own devices. This move marked a turning point for Apple—a company that has long shied away from making it easy for users to repair their own devices.
It was never meant to be. The iPhone maker launched the Self Service Repair portal in April, allowing customers to order parts, tools, and other resources to repair their own devices. This move marked a turning point for Apple—a company that has long shied away from making it easy for users to repair their own devices.
thumb_up Like (35)
comment Reply (3)
thumb_up 35 likes
comment 3 replies
L
Liam Wilson 1 minutes ago
While some repair advocates have praised Apple’s move, others have criticized it as being too ...
I
Isabella Johnson 7 minutes ago
But, for me, recycling is giving up … That really struck home when I visited an e-waste recycl...
V
While some repair advocates have praised Apple&#8217;s move, others have criticized it as being too difficult and expensive.&nbsp; 
 <h3>The Hidden Life of Our Used Stuff   US PIRG </h3> Three years ago, the documentary film producer Stacey Tenenbaum reached out to me about her new idea: To travel around the world and document some of the wildest graveyards for our stuff. I was immediately captivated by her vision.&nbsp; As Stacey gets ready to premiere her film,&nbsp;Scrap, in the U.S., I sat down (on Zoom) with her to talk about the film and how making it has changed how she looks at stuff.&nbsp; When asked about how making the film impacted her thoughts about consumption and stuff, Stacey said she now views recycling very differently: “Recycling should be the last resort, but it is the thing most people know about. We do it in our homes, and recycling seems to be a good thing.
While some repair advocates have praised Apple’s move, others have criticized it as being too difficult and expensive. 

The Hidden Life of Our Used Stuff US PIRG

Three years ago, the documentary film producer Stacey Tenenbaum reached out to me about her new idea: To travel around the world and document some of the wildest graveyards for our stuff. I was immediately captivated by her vision.  As Stacey gets ready to premiere her film, Scrap, in the U.S., I sat down (on Zoom) with her to talk about the film and how making it has changed how she looks at stuff.  When asked about how making the film impacted her thoughts about consumption and stuff, Stacey said she now views recycling very differently: “Recycling should be the last resort, but it is the thing most people know about. We do it in our homes, and recycling seems to be a good thing.
thumb_up Like (40)
comment Reply (3)
thumb_up 40 likes
comment 3 replies
C
Charlotte Lee 43 minutes ago
But, for me, recycling is giving up … That really struck home when I visited an e-waste recycl...
H
Henry Schmidt 76 minutes ago
Could We Lose The Right to Repair Our Cars Repair Roundup Week of May 9 iFixit News Ana içeriğe...
S
But, for me, recycling is giving up &#8230; That really struck home when I visited an e-waste recycling site in India.”&nbsp; Clarification: an earlier version of this blog incorrectly identified the purpose of the SMART Act, proposed legislation to address design patents in automobiles. The blog has been updated to clarify the purpose of that act and the REPAIR Act, which also targets repair and automobiles. May 17, 2022 Related Stories E-Waste 
 <h3>Microsoft Finds Repair Reduces Carbon Emissions  Repair Roundup  Week of May 2</h3> Consumer Rights 
 <h3>Advocates Sour On Apple s Repair Program  Repair Roundup Week of April 25</h3> Right to Repair 
 <h3>As Cars Get Smarter  Massachusetts Voters May Shape Their Future &#8211  WIRED</h3> 
 <h3> 0 Yorum </h3> Yorum Ekle 
 <h4>Yorum Ekle</h4> 1024 İptal Yorum gönder
But, for me, recycling is giving up … That really struck home when I visited an e-waste recycling site in India.”  Clarification: an earlier version of this blog incorrectly identified the purpose of the SMART Act, proposed legislation to address design patents in automobiles. The blog has been updated to clarify the purpose of that act and the REPAIR Act, which also targets repair and automobiles. May 17, 2022 Related Stories E-Waste

Microsoft Finds Repair Reduces Carbon Emissions Repair Roundup Week of May 2

Consumer Rights

Advocates Sour On Apple s Repair Program Repair Roundup Week of April 25

Right to Repair

As Cars Get Smarter Massachusetts Voters May Shape Their Future – WIRED

0 Yorum

Yorum Ekle

Yorum Ekle

1024 İptal Yorum gönder
thumb_up Like (33)
comment Reply (0)
thumb_up 33 likes

Write a Reply